Skip to main content

CIPR

  • Home
  • About
    • People
      • Director
      • Academics
      • Current PhD students
  • Research
    • Visiting Indigenous Fellowship
    • Recent Publications
  • Publications
    • CIPR Policy Paper
    • CAEPR Archive
  • News & Events
  • Study with us
  • Contact us

Research Spotlight

  • Market value for Indigenous Knowledge
  • Helping Spirits Stay Strong
  • Reparative Ways of Thinking
  • Community Driven Empowerment Through Mabu Liyan

Related Sites

  • ANU College of Arts & Social Sciences
  • Research School of Social Sciences
  • Australian National Internships Program

Administrator

Breadcrumb

HomeResearchPublicationsEvaluation and Review As Drivers of Reform In The Indigenous Policy Domain
Evaluation and review as drivers of reform in the Indigenous policy domain
Evaluation and review as drivers of reform in the Indigenous policy domain
Author/editor: M.C.Dillon
Year published: 2020
Issue no.: 2

Abstract

This Policy Insights Paper seeks to assess the influence of evaluation and review in influencing policy in the Indigenous affairs policy domain. The paper examines four high-level case studies of strategically significant policy issues within the Indigenous policy domain to assess the impact of evaluation in driving reform over time. Proponents of the greater use of evaluation argue that a major problem in the ongoing failure of governments to effectively address comparative Indigenous disadvantagerelates to the poor or inadequate use of evaluation. The paper questions the dominant public discourse amongst Commonwealth policymakers on the nature of policy, arguing it is far from linear and mechanistic, and not fully represented by rationalist models. In turn, this makes evaluation of policy initiatives even more challenging. The paper concludes that while there are benefits to evaluation and review, the impact of politics andpervasive structural power imbalances in determining the architecture of strategic policy settings makes policy evaluation and review highly problematic as drivers of policy outcomes and thus as drivers of reform.

File attachments

AttachmentSize
CAEPR_PIP_no2_2020_Dillon_0.pdf(5.04 MB)5.04 MB