Skip to main content

CIPR

  • Home
  • About
    • People
      • Director
      • Academics
      • Current PhD students
  • Research
    • Visiting Indigenous Fellowship
  • Publications
    • CIPR Policy Paper
    • CAEPR Archive
  • News & Events
  • Study with us
  • Contact us

Research Spotlight

  • Market value for Indigenous Knowledge
  • Helping Spirits Stay Strong
  • Reparative Ways of Thinking
  • Community Driven Empowerment Through Mabu Liyan

Related Sites

  • ANU College of Arts & Social Sciences
  • Research School of Social Sciences
  • Australian National Internships Program

Administrator

Breadcrumb

HomeResearchPublicationsCodesign In The Indigenous Policy Domain: Risks and Opportunities
Codesign in the Indigenous policy domain: Risks and opportunities
Codesign in the Indigenous policy domain: Risks and opportunities
Author/editor: M.C.Dillon
Year published: 2021
Issue no.: 296

Abstract

Abstract
In recent years, the requirement for First Nations participation through codesign has emerged as a key prerequisite of policy legitimacy in the Indigenous policy domain. In this Discussion Paper, the mainstream literature on codesign and collaborative governance is surveyed and considered, as a means of identifying the essential characteristics of effective codesign policy and program processes. The literature survey identifies two strands: one that asserts the merits and opportunities inherent in policy and program codesign, and a second that highlights the risks and challenges. Two nationally significant current and ongoing Indigenous policy development processes that have been described as codesign processes are then analysed and assessed. The paper concludes that codesign involves more than consultation, and ideally requires shared decision-making. Further, in relation to policy codesign processes, the literature and cases studies suggest the core design features that are required to ensure the processes contribute to creating public value and maintaining trust in democratic public policy institutions.

File attachments

AttachmentSize
CAEPR_DP_no_296_2021_Dillon.pdf(1.02 MB)1.02 MB